make the most of Lovereading debuts of the month
Search our site
Persons Unknown by Susie Steiner Read the opening extract of the brand new Susie Steiner book before its publication on 05/04/2018

Paul's Argumentation in Galatians A Pragma-dialectical Analysis by Mika Hietanen

Paul's Argumentation in Galatians A Pragma-dialectical Analysis

Part of the The Library of New Testament Studies Series


Paul's Argumentation in Galatians A Pragma-dialectical Analysis by Mika Hietanen

Galatians is a polemical letter which contains a substantial amount of argumentative passages. Paul evidently wanted to persuade by using the best arguments possible to convince his addressees. Using a state-of-the-art method from the discipline of argumentation analysis, Paul's argumentation can be analysed with a precision that standard exegetical methods cannot provide. The pragma-dialectical method developed in Amsterdam facilitates an analysis which is both descriptive and normative. On the one hand, Paul's argumentation can be described, such as the relationship between premisses and conclusions, the structure of the arguments, and features relating to rhetorical strategy. On the other hand, the method makes it possible to evaluate Paul's argumentation against a set of rules for sound reasoning. Fallacies and problematic arguments can be described accurately. The spiritual nature of Paul's matters do not relieve him of rationality, and Paul himself does not argue as if it did. Paul's argumentation is found problematic in several respects. There is a tension in the text: Paul works a great deal to argue his claims while at the same time giving the impression that he merely wants to declare his standpoints and does not want to carry out an argumentation at all. Many of the conclusions are presented as self-evident, even when they are not. Paul's style is far from an ideal model of the resolution of a dispute. Paul relies heavily on an argumentative strategy with maximal use of rhetorical devices. The analysis shows that a contemporary method of argumentation analysis provides tools necessary to adequately describe and understand both individual arguments and the overarching strategy of the argumentation in a Pauline text.


Mention - International Review of Biblical Studies, vol. 54:2007/08

About the Author

Mika Hietanen is Doctor of Theology in New Testament exegesis, Abo Akademi University, Finland.

More books by this author
Author 'Like for Like' recommendations

Loading other formats...

Book Info

Publication date

26th July 2007


Mika Hietanen

More books by Mika Hietanen
Author 'Like for Like'


T.& T.Clark Ltd an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing PLC


242 pages




I read new, exciting writers and established authors before publication and there is a great website full of brilliant books and opinions.


I love Lovereading for the wonderful like for like author recommendations and for highlighting new books, it's a great resource for readers!


It is a website dedicated to those who adore reading It really is a one stop shop for book lovers. Love it!

Edel Waugh

You can trust Lovereading to show unbiased reviews by actual, ordinary readers that help likeminded booklovers choose their next great read.

Linda Hill

Lovereading are lovely people who send me lovely books. What's not to love?

Gavin Dimmock

With literary excellence, humour and drama, Lovereading's got value and is a real stress-calmer!

Siobhan McDowell

My favourite thing about is the 'like for like' page this has really introduced me to some good reads! That and lots of honest reviews.

Sam Lewis

It has opened my eyes to different authors and genres. Just log on and try, you will be surprised and not want for reading material again.

Jocelyn Garvey