make the most of Lovereading killer on the wall granchester Harry Potter House Eds hold back the stars
Search our site
Alex, Approximately by Jenn Bennett Read the opening extract of the brand new Jenn Bennett book before its publication on 27/07/2017

Humanity's End Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement by Nicholas (Victoria University of Wellington) Agar

Humanity's End Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement

Part of the Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology Series

RRP £19.95


Humanity's End Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement by Nicholas (Victoria University of Wellington) Agar

Proposals to make us smarter than the greatest geniuses or to add thousands of years to our life spans seem fit only for the spam folder or trash can. And yet this is what contemporary advocates of radical enhancement offer in all seriousness. They present a variety of technologies and therapies that will expand our capacities far beyond what is currently possible for human beings. In Humanity's End, Nicholas Agar argues against radical enhancement, describing its destructive consequences. Agar examines the proposals of four prominent radical enhancers: Ray Kurzweil, who argues that technology will enable our escape from human biology; Aubrey de Grey, who calls for anti-aging therapies that will achieve longevity escape velocity ; Nick Bostrom, who defends the morality and rationality of enhancement; and James Hughes, who envisions a harmonious democracy of the enhanced and the unenhanced. Agar argues that the outcomes of radical enhancement could be darker than the rosy futures described by these thinkers. The most dramatic means of enhancing our cognitive powers could in fact kill us; the radical extension of our life span could eliminate experiences of great value from our lives; and a situation in which some humans are radically enhanced and others are not could lead to tyranny of posthumans over humans.


Penetrating and lucid...This is the definitive critique of what [Agar] calls 'radical enhancement.' * Monash Bioethic Review * An evenhanded treatment of an area ripe for serious philosophical scrutiny. Agar's analysis is philosophically astute, empirically informed, and historically shrewd. It is a welcome corrective to the occasional extravagancies of the human sciences. * Quarterly Review of Biology * Agar's book is a valuable survey of the most important interlocutors in the conversation about posthumanism...should be taken may well be persuaded by Agar's arguments. * Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies *

About the Author

Nicholas Agar is Reader in Philosophy at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

More books by this author
Author 'Like for Like' recommendations

Loading other formats...

Book Info

Publication date

16th August 2013


Nicholas (Victoria University of Wellington) Agar

More books by Nicholas (Victoria University of Wellington) Agar
Author 'Like for Like'


Bradford Books an imprint of MIT Press Ltd


232 pages
Interest Age: From 18 years


Ethics & moral philosophy



Hooked on books? Give Lovereading a go - for the chance to discover brilliant books, and to see why our members love it so.

Claire Hill

Lovereading are lovely people who send me lovely books. What's not to love?

Gavin Dimmock

A great place to go to find your next literary escape, and where you don't have to judge a book by its cover!

Suzanne Beney

Lovereading is pitched at just the right level for all the various types of people who enjoy reading in its many forms.

Pam Woodburn

Lovereading does a stella job in promoting both new and established authors.

Iris Clements

I love Lovereading because I get to read great books and then get to tell everybody how good they are.

Sally Doel

You can trust Lovereading to show unbiased reviews by actual, ordinary readers that help likeminded booklovers choose their next great read.

Linda Hill

I love 'try before you buy' extracts. I love the wide range of authors & genres. I love the author info. I love books!

Judi Davies